Post by account_disabled on Feb 18, 2024 0:31:32 GMT -5
Since the 19th century, scientists have investigated the relationship between human activity and climate change . However, it was in the 1950s that solid evidence was found that suggested a link. Since then, world leaders and international organizations have been calling for urgent action to mitigate the direct and collateral effects of rising global temperatures, according to EcoWatch .
In this context, a new case could establish Middle East Mobile Number List an important precedent in the fight against the climate crisis: Does climate inaction violate human rights? This is a question that has gained importance in recent years, as the effects of climate change intensify and increasingly affect vulnerable communities around the world.
Climate crisis reaches the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)
In a landmark first case before one of Europe's most important institutions protecting human rights, plaintiffs have argued that the governments of Switzerland and France violate their human rights by not doing enough to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. that cause the planet's temperature to warm.
The hearings mark a crucial moment for the legal fight for more ambitious climate action, said Sébastien Duyck, human rights and climate campaign manager at the Center for International Environmental Law.
“[The hearings] have the potential to set an influential legal precedent that would further reaffirm that States have an obligation to take more appropriate measures against climate change as a matter of their human rights obligations.”
Sébastien Duyck, human rights and climate campaign manager at the Center for International Environmental Law.
Older women inspire and promote change
The first climate-related case ever heard by the European Court of Human Rights took place in Strasbourg, France, on Wednesday. The case was brought by a group of older women seeking protection from increasingly intense heat waves.
With 2,038 members of KlimaSeniorinnen (Swiss Senior Women for Climate Protection), together with four individuals, they argue that older people, especially women, are at greater risk of dying during periods of high temperatures and that Switzerland should do more to prevent this.
«We have filed a lawsuit because Switzerland is doing too little to contain the climate catastrophe. Rising temperatures are already having serious consequences for our physical and mental health. "The large number of heat waves is making us older women sick."
co-president of KlimaSeniorinnen, Anne Mahrer.
One of the women's lawyers, Cordelia Bähr, told Greenpeace that the special risk faced by older women meant that the Swiss government was obliged to protect their right to life, health and well-being, as guaranteed by articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The group had previously brought the case that climate inaction violates rights to Swiss courts, but they rejected it, arguing that everyone is affected by it, not just the plaintiff group. Government lawyers argued that Switzerland is doing everything it can against climate change.
Insufficient climate policies
The second case has been brought forward by the former mayor of Grande-Synthe, in northern France, Damien Carême, who is now a member of the European Parliament. Carême claims he is personally a victim of France's insufficient climate policies as rising temperatures threaten his Calais home with flooding and even possible submergence by 2030.
Similar to the KlimaSeniorinnen case, Carême argues that climate inaction violates human rights to life, private property and family, under articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which is an international treaty that protects human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe.
In this context, a new case could establish Middle East Mobile Number List an important precedent in the fight against the climate crisis: Does climate inaction violate human rights? This is a question that has gained importance in recent years, as the effects of climate change intensify and increasingly affect vulnerable communities around the world.
Climate crisis reaches the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR)
In a landmark first case before one of Europe's most important institutions protecting human rights, plaintiffs have argued that the governments of Switzerland and France violate their human rights by not doing enough to reduce greenhouse gas emissions. that cause the planet's temperature to warm.
The hearings mark a crucial moment for the legal fight for more ambitious climate action, said Sébastien Duyck, human rights and climate campaign manager at the Center for International Environmental Law.
“[The hearings] have the potential to set an influential legal precedent that would further reaffirm that States have an obligation to take more appropriate measures against climate change as a matter of their human rights obligations.”
Sébastien Duyck, human rights and climate campaign manager at the Center for International Environmental Law.
Older women inspire and promote change
The first climate-related case ever heard by the European Court of Human Rights took place in Strasbourg, France, on Wednesday. The case was brought by a group of older women seeking protection from increasingly intense heat waves.
With 2,038 members of KlimaSeniorinnen (Swiss Senior Women for Climate Protection), together with four individuals, they argue that older people, especially women, are at greater risk of dying during periods of high temperatures and that Switzerland should do more to prevent this.
«We have filed a lawsuit because Switzerland is doing too little to contain the climate catastrophe. Rising temperatures are already having serious consequences for our physical and mental health. "The large number of heat waves is making us older women sick."
co-president of KlimaSeniorinnen, Anne Mahrer.
One of the women's lawyers, Cordelia Bähr, told Greenpeace that the special risk faced by older women meant that the Swiss government was obliged to protect their right to life, health and well-being, as guaranteed by articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights.
The group had previously brought the case that climate inaction violates rights to Swiss courts, but they rejected it, arguing that everyone is affected by it, not just the plaintiff group. Government lawyers argued that Switzerland is doing everything it can against climate change.
Insufficient climate policies
The second case has been brought forward by the former mayor of Grande-Synthe, in northern France, Damien Carême, who is now a member of the European Parliament. Carême claims he is personally a victim of France's insufficient climate policies as rising temperatures threaten his Calais home with flooding and even possible submergence by 2030.
Similar to the KlimaSeniorinnen case, Carême argues that climate inaction violates human rights to life, private property and family, under articles 2 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which is an international treaty that protects human rights and fundamental freedoms in Europe.